"2008 392 HEMI" @ SEMA 2005

Discussion of the 5.7L-6.1L-6.4L HEMIs.

Moderator: scottm

Post Reply
User avatar
scottm
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

"2008 392 HEMI" @ SEMA 2005

Post by scottm »

I heard that DCX is showing a 392 HEMI (6.4)
in a 1970 Challenger at the SEMA 2005 show.
I am trying to dig up some good pictures that
I can post for you guys to check out real soon.
User avatar
scottm
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: "2008 392 HEMI" @ SEMA 2005

Post by scottm »

scottm wrote:I heard that DCX is showing a 392 HEMI (6.4)
in a 1970 Challenger at the SEMA 2005 show.
I was curious if this would be the next SRT motor.
Perhaps dropping the 6.1 down into normal duties.
But it's sounding like this 6.4 may just be a stroker
motor that may come out from Mopar Performance.
User avatar
scottm
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by scottm »

Here we go, I posted some pictures of the car...

http://www.highflow.com/gallery2/main.p ... _itemId=16
AndreS
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:38 am
Location: Western WA

Post by AndreS »

the talk i've read about it so far is that it's only going to be a crate motor.

510 hp and i think it's still being held back at that. i don't think 600 hp is out of reach on that engine.
freebird12345687
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:22 am

Post by freebird12345687 »

Thats very interesting. I'm a bit dissapointed however. When looking at the specs of the 6.1 block i.e. 4.06 inch bore, it seems to me that with a healthy .060 bore and 4 inch crank that would yield 426 cubic inches. However going on the assumption that the 6.1 block is cast like the 5.7 block then .060 over just can't be done. I imagine it was a mear crankshaft change to yield this 392. 392 is nostalgic yes but, i just doesn't hold the bearing that 426 does. On the comment on the 392 being capable of making 600 horse, the 5.7 heads just cleaned up and a moderate polish job flow enough air to support that number. My own thoughts are: Dodge should build the Challenger to compete head on with the mustang GT. Naturally it'll have the base, the SXT, and an R/T model. Base and SXT recieving naturally the V6s. The R/T model i think should have a 320+/- 4.7L cam slinger with a solid axle and a five speed. The R/T should compete directly with the Mustang in both price and performance. (Lets let bigones be bigones here and just admit the new Rustang is no slouch). Next up I think should be naturally an SRT-8 with the 6.1L and 4 whel independent and bells and whistles and fancy gidgets and gadgets a doodads. Then maybe a limited run of a T/A model that has a small block 426 Hemi and compete directly with the new GT500 assuming it'll see production. I dunno i'm rambling now.
dodgedifferent2
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 8:07 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by dodgedifferent2 »

i like those thoughts freebird

just dont mess it up and make it another 4 door
MATT DELANEY
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by MATT DELANEY »

tHE 392 IS A 6.1 WITH A 3.798 STROKE(4.055 BORE). IT MAKES 510 HP AND 510 LBS OF TORQUE. I BUILT THE CAR IN SEMA WITH THE MOTOR AND CAN TELL YOU THAT THE MOTOR WILL BE AVAILABLE IN MARCH
charliec
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:36 pm

Love that Chally!

Post by charliec »

Matt, you are the master! What a car! Once again, nicely done, Mr. Delaney... Heidt's SuperRide IRS, the whole works.... Wow!

Will it be for sale anytime soon? Inquiring minds want to know![/img]
1970 'Cuda convertible 440+6
1970 Charger R/T 440
2005 Dodge Magnum R/T
MATT DELANEY
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by MATT DELANEY »

This car and the Roadrunner were built so I would have a stock of cars for advertising. I constantly have requests to send a car to a show and have none in inventory. If you like this one wait until you see what we have planed for the power tour.
Post Reply