Hannity Blasts NYT for Revealing Ferguson Cop's Address

Down and dirty debates (well, yeah, politics).
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 2856
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Texas

Hannity Blasts NYT for Revealing Ferguson Cop's Address

Post by scottm » Wed Nov 26, 2014 6:33 pm


Sean Hannity Blasts NYT for Revealing Ferguson Cop's Address
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whit ... ps-address
Fox News anchor Sean Hannity and his guests on Thursday night slammed the New York Times for printing key details about Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson's home address. An angry Hannity attacked, "If anything happens to that man, his family, or that home...the culpability is with them."

Conservative columnist Deroy Murdock railed, "Shame on the New York Times for doing that. They're literally putting that man and his family in mortal danger." He excoriated the paper for the "incredibly reckless" move.

As noted by Mediaite, the Times included a picture of Wilson's marriage certificate and information about the street that Mr. Wilson and his wife live on.
Why Can’t We Publish Addresses Of New York Times Reporters?
http://gotnews.com/cant-publish-address ... reporters/
New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times so here are their addresses.

GotNews.com strenuously objects to publishing the addresses of individuals who are being targeted with death threats.

GotNews.com published the address of Ebola patient Nina Pham so that people could avoid going to her Houston apartment.

But it would also be wrong to publish the addresses of journalists without their consent.

It would be wrong, for example, to publish Bosman’s address at

CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204

It would be similarly wrong to publish the address of Robertson, too.

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203

So why do journalists think they are beyond examination?

How does it advance the story to know where Darren Wilson and his newly wed live?
I once thought used car salesmen and lawyers were the lowest of the low.
But, in fact, it's liberal news "reporters" who are actually the lowest of all.

Post Reply